Posted on another site.

[sneezwort]

I had a look and could not see if anyone has posted it in this forum, but it may be worth a note:

This may be some interest to some of you. Even if you do not do porn, think about it, as time goes on, they may bring in more and more laws and even a topless pic may become an offence on the net or even dvde.

http://www.backlash-uk.org.uk/index.html

and this:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Violent-Porn/

[raven]

Have been watching this closely as I film BDSM stuff for the web.
The law as it is proposed is wide open for the law to say what is violent which means it "could" affect all makers of porn.
Its worth taking a look....

The big thing is that the law would say that there is no such thing as Mutual consent...so if a girl looks as if she is suffering or is being hurt etc the pic could be deemed as being violent.....they have put the violent thing in alongside, child porn and a couple of other things in the hope that nobody will take any notice.

Be aware of the proposed new laws....as it could mean lots of other things being added to it should it get passed.

[Cenobitez]

Suicide Girls was nailed on this, they claimed the FBI tried to do them in an awkward place, then turned out they shit it instead.

They said....
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/29/suicide_girls_respon.html

They was lashed...
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/28/suicide_girls_rumord.html

This has been comiong for well over a year to 18 months, just most people dont care about the alt side until it gets so bad it cant be over looked.

[Cenobitez]

p.s. Shannon Larratt is the man for being the proverbial log in the mud :)